Suddenly, a mission to investigate whether Venus might be hospitable to life after all doesn’t seem quite so outlandish.
Astronomers announced Monday (Sept. 14) that they have identified phosphine, a chemical some scientists have proposed may be a sign of life, in the clouds of Venus. The new research relied on data from two ground-based telescopes, and scientists already have plans to tug a little more at the Venusian mystery from Earth’s surface.
But, if we really want to know what’s going on with this strange chemical in the thick, acidic clouds of our planetary neighbor, we’re going to need to get a lot closer, even right into Venus’ clouds — where no spacecraft has ventured in 35 years.
“This is something more that we can’t explain about Venus,” Sanjay Limaye, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, who wasn’t involved in the new study, told Space.com. “Venus has got more questions [about it] than Mars, which is why we are suggesting that Venus should be considered an astrobiology target.”
It’s not that scientists haven’t wanted to explore Venus more thoroughly, of course. But the planet is seriously rough on the vital organs of a spacecraft. Take a computer, some electronics and a bunch of ultra-sensitive instruments and send them through acidic clouds to a surface that’s essentially a broiling pressure cooker, and, well, it isn’t pretty. In fact, no spacecraft has ever survived a full two hours on the surface of Venus.
“Venus is ready for the armada to get there, but it’s less forgiving than Mars,” James Garvin, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, who wasn’t involved in the new research but is the principal investigator on a Venus atmospheric probe mission that NASA is evaluating, told Space.com.
That said, engineers have been busy in the decades since the last spacecraft ventured into Venus’ atmosphere when the Soviet Vega probes did so in the mid-1980s. With the added impetus created by the tantalizing new research, scientists hope that agencies may now turn their sights to more — and more daring — Venus missions.
“I think this is catalytic,” Garvin said of the potential impact of the new research on the motivation to explore Venus. “After a mad foray, a flourish of attempts to understand Venus in the ’70s and early ’80s, there was a hiatus and it’s actually been 35 years since any mission by any country on this planet has visited the atmosphere of Venus.”
Back to Venus?
Right now, Venus has just one spacecraft companion, Japan’s Akatsuki orbiter. Akatsuki launched in 2010 and, while it flubbed its first attempt to orbit Venus later that year, it succeeded on a second attempt in 2015. The spacecraft has spent its tenure studying the weather on Venus and looking for flashes of lightning — all from a safe orbit, of course.
NASA’s, however, hasn’t had a dedicated mission to Venus since the Magellan probe orbited from 1990 to 1994. But the new research may prompt NASA to end that drought. “It’s time to prioritize Venus,” NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine wrote in a tweet on Monday about the phosphine detection, which he called “the most significant development yet in building the case for life off Earth.”
NASA is evaluating two Venus-targeted proposals in its current round of so-called Discovery projects, the same class of mission that includes the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, the geophysics InSight lander on Mars and the upcoming asteroid missions Lucy and Psyche.
Other space agencies are also considering a visit. India’s space agency is considering a mission called Shukrayaan-1, an orbiter that would launch in 2023 and study Venus’ surface. Russia is considering a hardier version of its Soviet-era landers, a longer-lived surface mission. The European Space Agency (ESA) is evaluating a proposal for a mission called EnVision, a geology orbiter that would launch in 2032 and could tell scientists about alternative explanations for the phosphine detection, such as by determining whether the planet hosts active volcanoes that could be producing the gas.
Scientists say that the engineering is ready for such missions, and we long ago hit the point where we had machinery worth sending. “It’s so frustrating that we have the technology and have had much of this technology for so long and we’re just ready to bring this to bear on Venus now,” Darby Dyar, a planetary scientist at the Planetary Science Institute and the deputy principal investigator on the second mission proposal NASA is currently considering, told Space.com. “Venus offers a smorgasbord of really cool missions that you can do.”
There are plenty of other Venus mission concepts out there that aren’t formally under agency review, ranging all the way from modest endeavors to NASA’s most ambitious (and most expensive) category of projects, on the scale of the agency’s sophisticated Mars rovers Curiosity and Perseverance.
But we’ll need several spacecraft to really understand the story of Venus. “There’s not a single mission,” Limaye said. “It’s a collection of missions because there are so many different investigations that not a single mission can address all the questions and it’ll be a fight to decide which missions should be flown first.”
(Venus scientists, even those proposing specific missions, regularly emphasize that because Venus is so understudied, any mission to go there at all would be an improvement over the status quo.)
In the context of the phosphine detection announced this week, there are two ways future missions could build on the new research. Either spacecraft could confirm the detection itself, or they could develop our larger understanding of Venus, helping scientists interpret the detection.
Investigating phosphine up close
The new claim of detecting phosphine at Venus is based only on observations taken by ground-based telescopes, but those observations pose two key challenges.
The first is that there’s still a chance the detections weren’t actually of phosphine: The scientists studied only a small window of the spectral signature — a sort of chemical barcode, in which the researchers saw only what corresponded to one line of the code. In order to more confidently identify the chemical, scientists will need to be able to see one or more other lines of that signature.
A second challenge is that the telescopes the scientists used can’t identify precisely where in Venus’ atmosphere the phosphine might be. All scientists know so far is that it must be more than 30 miles (50 kilometers) above the surface of Venus. Without a more precise understanding of the signal’s altitude, it’s difficult to know what environment the chemical may be in.
Breaking the decades-long drought of atmospheric probes at Venus should help scientists to manage both of those challenges.
“We’d like to see really any kind of mission go back to Venus,” Sara Seager, an astronomer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and co-author on the new research, said during a news conference held on Monday (Sept. 14). “Something that’s capable of measuring gases in the atmosphere, something that has a so-called mass spectrometer that can identify larger complex molecules that could only be associated with life,” she said, describing her mission wishlist, adding that a balloon might be the best design for such a spacecraft.
While it isn’t a balloon, one of the two missions NASA is currently considering would be equipped to tackle the phosphine mystery head-on, Garvin said of the mission proposal he leads, called DAVINCI+ (short for Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble Gases, Chemistry, and Imaging Plus).
DAVINCI+ is a two-part mission that includes a probe that would travel through Venus’ entire atmosphere to the planet’s surface in about an hour, sampling as it goes, and an orbiter that would study the atmosphere of Venus’ daylight side and the terrain of its night side for a full Venusian year, or 225 Earth days.
The probe’s descent, in particular, would tell scientists whether the phosphine detection was real and confirm how prevalent the gas is in the Venusian atmosphere. It would also give scientists the thorough understanding of chemistry on Venus that is severely lacking, stymying researchers’ attempts to interpret data.
And, while the mission may sound a bit unprecedented, it isn’t really, Garvin said. The chemical laboratory at the heart of DAVINCI+ would be essentially the same as those in NASA’s Mars Curiosity and Perseverance rovers and the Dragonfly drone that the agency will send to fly on Saturn’s strange moon Titan, a mission due to launch in 2026.
“The same way we brought that story to Mars with the Curiosity, and soon Perseverance, rovers; we want to invert that and bring it to the atmosphere, essentially developing a flying sampling rover, that instead of driving, it’s flying and falling,” Garvin said. “We have to bring the best-instrumented chemistry lab to the samples we want to study in the Venus atmosphere with 21st-century gear.”
A step farther
The other Venus mission NASA is currently evaluating could build on the phosphine detection in a different way. VERITAS (short for Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography and Spectroscopy) wouldn’t probe the atmosphere directly and wouldn’t be able to confirm the phosphine detection up close.
Instead, it’s an orbiter that would use radar and spectroscopy to study the surface of Venus. VERITAS is designed to produce a high-resolution topographical map of Venus and identify what types of rocks are found on its surface and where.
“To get the first look at global composition at least is going to tell us so much, even if the method is not everything you might wish for,” Sue Smrekar, a planetary geophysicist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California and the principal investigator on the VERITAS proposal, told Space.com. “It’s going to be, I think, really spectacular in terms of enhancing our understanding of surface chemistry.”
The data collected by VERITAS could help scientists address ongoing mysteries like how long Venus had an ocean and how quickly it disappeared, or whether there are still active volcanos spewing chemicals into the planet’s atmosphere from its deep innards. Understanding these issues could determine whether the detected phosphine can be explained without invoking life.
VERITAS would also build a foundation for future missions, particularly by mapping the planet’s surface in detail. “We’ve had so much success at NASA having global reconnaissance to find the scientifically most compelling targets and then coming back to follow up,” Smrekar said. “Yeah, you need a map,” Dyar added.
VERITAS and DAVINCI+ are two of four concepts from which Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA’s associate administrator for the Science Mission Directorate will select one or more missions next spring. Like his boss Bridenstine, Zurbuchen expressed excitement about the new phosphine finding, calling the paper “intriguing,” although he was less gung-ho in his remarks.
“We trust in the scientific peer review process & look forward to the robust discussion that will follow its publication,” Zurbuchen wrote on Twitter, referencing both the consideration of VERITAS and DAVINCI+, and NASA’s involvement in ESA’s potential EnVision mission.
One thing is for sure: if these or any other missions visit our neighboring world, Venus scientists will be thrilled.
“The ’20s could be a rebirth of using Venus as a clue to the solar system and accessible universe, the same way we’ve used Mars and the moon and now [Jupiter’s moon] Europa so compellingly.” Garvin said, adding that he hopes space agencies use this decade to gather the data that has been so sorely lacking about our neighboring world.
“If we can do that in the ’20s, the ’30s will erupt into this beautiful masterpiece of new kinds of missions: Titan, hopefully also to Venus, Mars, women living on the moon. I mean, it’s going to be a different space age.” Garvin said. “To be honest, I wouldn’t be surprised if we wake up in the ’30s and say, ‘Oh, my god, how could we have missed this?'”